💰 Funding Details

Funding Description

Call identifier: HORIZON-CL6-2025-02-FARM2FORK-04-two-stage

Programme / Cluster: Horizon Europe – Cluster 6 “Food, Bio-economy, Natural Resources, Agriculture & Environment”

Type of action: HORIZON-RIA (Research & Innovation Action) implemented through a Lump-Sum Model Grant Agreement (MGA)

Available budget per project: up to €18 000 000 (lump-sum; single reimbursement of agreed workplan)

Opening / deadlines:

• Stage 1: 06 May 2025 → 04 Sept 2025 (17:00 CET)

• Stage 2: invitation only → 18 Feb 2026 (17:00 CET)

What is funded

• Development, testing and validation of innovative tools, methods and technologies (incl. AI, IoT, image recognition, smart meters, sensors) that measure, monitor, prevent and reduce food waste at household level.

• Large-scale pan-European pilots generating harmonised food-waste data (edible & inedible fractions) across diverse socio-economic groups.

• Research on root causes & behavioural drivers of household food waste; design of evidence-based interventions and policy recommendations.

• Creation of interoperable metadata standards and integration of data in the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC).

• Multi-actor, trans-disciplinary approaches incorporating social sciences & humanities (SSH), citizen science, and civil-society engagement.

• Actions that support Member-State reporting under the Waste Framework Directive and contribute to Green Deal, Farm2Fork and Food 2030 objectives.

Eligibility snapshot

• Consortium: minimum 3 independent legal entities from 3 different EU Member States or Horizon-Europe Associated Countries (HE GA Art 22).

• Participant types: universities, RTOs, SMEs, large industry, NGOs, consumer organisations, public authorities, digital solution providers, utilities.

• Funding rate: 100 % of eligible costs (Lump-Sum agreement – actual costs not declared; payment linked to completion of work packages).

• In-kind contributions & third parties: allowed under lump-sum, but must be budgeted ex-ante.

• Ethics, open science, gender equality plan (GEP) and data management plan (DMP) are compulsory.

Key grant specifics

• Two-stage evaluation – concise 10-page outline in Stage 1; full proposal (~45 pages) only if invited.

• Technology Readiness Levels (TRL): typically start TRL 3-4 → end TRL 6-7 for tools / methods (guideline, not formal).

• Complementarity with prior EU projects (CHORIZO, WASTELESS, REFRESH, etc.) and alignment with the European Consumer Food Waste Forum is expected.

• No co-funding or national match is required; lump-sum simplifies reporting but asks for robust budgeting during proposal.

📊 Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Insight

Horizon Europe applies three core criteria, each scored 0–5. Minimum threshold per criterion is 3; overall threshold 10/15. Weighting is identical across criteria in both stages.

Stage 1 (outline – 10 pages)

Only Excellence & Impact are evaluated (each threshold 4/5); Implementation is not scored but must be credible.

Stage 2 (full proposal)

1. Excellence (0–5)

• Clarity & pertinence of objectives; alignment with topic scope & expected outcomes.

• Soundness of methodology incl. interdisciplinarity, citizen science, SSH dimension.

• Credibility of new tools/technologies; consideration of state-of-the-art & previous EU projects.

2. Impact (0–5)

• Credibility of pathways toward reducing household food waste & related GHG emissions.

• Suitability of KPIs, target groups, uptake mechanisms; contribution to Waste Framework reporting.

• Quality of measures to exploit, disseminate & communicate; open science & EOSC integration.

• Barriers/risks (regulatory, behavioural, market) and mitigation strategies.

3. Quality & Efficiency of Implementation (0–5)

• Quality of work plan, WPs, milestones, deliverables; coherence with lump-sum budgeting.

• Consortium competence, complementarity & geographical balance; involvement of end-users.

• Appropriateness of resources & allocation; risk management & decision-making structures.

Cross-cutting considerations (may influence scores)

- Integration of gender dimension & inclusiveness in R&I content.

- Addressing climate & environmental impacts (Do No Significant Harm principle).

- Ethics, data protection, AI transparency.

Tie-break priorities

If proposals receive the same total score, evaluators prioritise:

1. Higher Impact score

2. Higher Excellence score

3. Gender balance among key personnel

4. Widening-country participation

5. Earlier submission time

Evaluator expectations – key takeaways

• Quantified baselines & targets: avoid generic claims (e.g., give % food-waste reduction linked to sample size).

• Policy relevance: show concrete links to national reporting templates & Eurostat indicators.

• Scalability & EU added value: demonstrate solution transferability to > 50 % of EU households by 2030.

• Consistency between objectives, methodology, budget and consortium expertise – any mismatch is penalised.

📝 Application Strategy

Strategic Application Guide

1. Build a mission-oriented consortium

- Cover full knowledge chain: behavioural scientists, data scientists, AI developers, food technologists, wastewater experts, sociologists, EOSC specialists.

- Secure end-users & multipliers: consumer associations, municipalities, retailers, utilities (for wastewater sampling), NGOs, digital-app companies.

- Include at least 8–10 countries to guarantee geographical and socio-economic variety; involve Associated Countries for extra evaluation points.

2. Design a compelling concept for Stage 1 (max 10 pages)

- One clear narrative: “From precise measurement → deeper understanding → targeted prevention → measurable reduction”.

- Map Expected Outcomes to specific Work Packages (WPs) with KPIs.

- Provide a visual pilot matrix (countries × household segments × tools).

- Quantify ambition: e.g. “measure 15 000 households; achieve ≥ 25 % reduction in avoidable food waste; enable 10 Member States to meet 2030 target.”

3. Craft a robust Stage 2 full proposal

1. Excellence

• Show state-of-the-art review linking to CHORIZO & WASTELESS gaps.

• Detail multidisciplinary methodology; explain AI bias mitigation, citizen-science protocols, metadata standards.

2. Impact

• Provide a pathway-to-policy: how results feed national reporting, Waste Framework targets, Green Deal.

• Include exploitation & scaling plan (open-source toolbox, pay-per-use SaaS, standardisation roadmap).

• Quantified impacts: GHG reduction, litres of water saved, economic savings per household.

3. Implementation

• Create a lean WP structure (6–8 WPs) with lump-sum milestones; link budget to deliverables.

• Show risk management (data privacy, AI bias, citizen fatigue) with mitigations.

4. Integrate cross-cutting requirements

- SSH integration: dedicate a WP to behavioural insights.

- Gender & inclusiveness: sampling strategy ensuring representation; integrate gender dimension in data analytics.

- Open Science: commit to EOSC-compliant datasets, open-access publications, FAIR principles.

- Climate & sustainability: perform life-cycle assessment (LCA) of technological solutions.

5. Timetable & milestones

- M0–M6: Tool refinement & ethical approvals.

- M7–M30: Household pilots (2–3 seasonal cycles).

- M18: Interim data release to Member-States.

- M31–M42: Impact validation, policy simulation, replication toolkit.

- M48: Final conference & hand-over to EU Platform on Food Losses & Waste.

6. Proposal writing tips

- Use HEU formats: part A (forms) & part B (narrative).

- Keep lump-sum budget proportional to tasks; evaluators look for realism, not cost category detail.

- Include Gantt chart & PERT diagram; cross-reference them with deliverables list.

- Solicit external advisory board letters (policy-makers, UN FAO, consumer groups) – attach as annex if needed.

Research and innovation for food waste prevention and reduction at household level through measurement, monitoring and new technologies

Quick Facts for Netherlands Applicants

Unlock Full Eligibility Report